These rural right-wingers are trying to create their own state
- Text by Elijah Hurwitz
- Photography by Elijah Hurwitz
It’s a slow day at Quigley’s General Store in Klamath River, California. The picked over mini-mart lies on a remote stretch of Highway 96 – a road located just 30 miles south of the Oregon state line, and a full day’s drive away from the palm trees and traffic jams of LA. Nearby, nestled between forests of evergreen pine and fir, a local town hall flies a green flag emblazoned with two crosses and a gold mining pan.
Quigley’s mini-mart is decorated with stickers of this same insignia, which apparently represents the “Great Seal of State of Jefferson” – an imagined 51st state made up of deeply red rural counties in Northern California and Southern Oregon. Founded back in 1941, the ‘state’ was formed after less populated rural counties began to feel distanced from their more liberal state representatives. Now, 76 years later – roused by the rise of Trump and the UK’s Brexit result – a surge of new support could make this imagined state more of a reality.
“I don’t want to sound like a complete hick, but guns is a big [issue] for me… we don’t need gun control out here as much,” says Garrett Rider, a resident of Klamath River and an employee at the Quigley’s mini-mart. “I’m an anarchist at heart. I’m independent and believe everyone should take care of themselves. That’s pretty much how I think about The State of Jefferson.”
Another resident, George Webb, has similar notions. Wary of authority, he built his family’s home in a converted barn without permission, in what he calls a “protest against the government.” It currently stands outside of Yreka, the imagined capital of Jefferson.
“I think the light went on for me with the State of Jefferson in 2010,” he explains. “I started looking at the history and everything, and it was just the answer to my whole life’s woes, where I felt like the government was taking over everyone’s lives.”
He continues: “Our state is completely and totally out of control. Billions of dollars in debt, and they keep legislating against the will of those of us who need to be allowed to work. Now we are able to concentrate way more on our local state battle.”
Webb’s reference to being “allowed to work” is a shot at the state and federal environmental regulations that many here believe were harbingers of their economic doom. Siskiyou County, for example, was once a bastion of logging, salmon fishing, and gold mining – today, its unemployment rate is 9.2 per cent (the statewide rate is 5.2 per cent).
Down on the banks of the Klamath River, itinerant gold miner and bluegrass musician Jim Dwyer also has a few thoughts on the subject. He lives in an RV and pans for gold by hand. “I’m an Oregonian, and a Jeffersonian,” he says. “I’ve always lived on the state line. When I grew up in Klamath Falls you had to do more than one thing to make a living. You couldn’t just be a logger or miner or mill worker… you had do a little gold panning, and get $25 or $30 on a Saturday. When a mill would close and people got laid off, a few of us would jump in a pickup and go out in the woods, hunt mushrooms, and get gold. That’s what the State of Jefferson is about.”
Cutting regulations is a dream for a small-time right-wing prospector like Jim, but there are other ways the hypothetical state could earn its keep. Ben and Katie Yuma of Medford, Oregon are libertarian-leaning marijuana growers at the forefront of the fledgeling industry, and have recently built a licensed operation named Jefferson State Farms in their backyard. They don’t agree with every conservative Republican stance, but would still like to see it happen.
“Every grower we know is on board with the Jefferson movement,” Katie says. “It might mean we can only sell our product in the new state, but it might also keep a lot of competition out.”
“Most of all people feel not represented, and in Jefferson our votes would count,” Ben adds. “I think legal marijuana would be highly supported in the new state, because being rural we don’t have a lot of revenue. I’ve read that we’re taking in more in many small towns than we’re providing for – so having something to add to the economy would be huge. How could anybody not favour that? The risk is people living on government assistance, and whether we’d still be able to provide for them.”
And many government funded services would be thrown into disarray should Jefferson supporters get their way – including healthcare, prisons, state taxes, roads, schools, and welfare. However, Mark Baird, a rancher and retired airline pilot from outside of Yreka, seems unphased by the challenge. Currently leading the charge for the state of Jefferson, he took steps to sue Sacramento this May for “dilution of vote”. According to him, California has far too few political representatives for its population.
“When you look at the representative ratios in California, we see that 51 per cent of state level representation is from a line at north LA County south to the Mexican border – so literally one-third of California can pass any law they want any time they want, and it will pass, no matter what anyone else wants,” he says. “That’s not good.”
Mark has an upbeat manner, and quickly cites West Virginia’s secession in 1861, and more recently, Neil Gorsuch’s appointment to the Supreme Court by Donald Trump, as reasons for optimism. “They all hate us,” he continues. “Democrats and Republicans. They hate us because we want to do something and the status quo hates change. They don’t want to see what we propose happen, which is returning power to the people.”
The cost for improving that ratio of representation through secession would be steep. Marty Walters is a Democrat running in next year’s primaries who hopes to challenge Republican incumbent Doug LaMalfa in California’s 1st congressional district. “We’d immediately become the poorest state, below Mississippi in terms of economics and demographics which would be a huge impact to a number of folks who rely on government programs for supplementing healthcare,” she says. “We get more benefit from California than we pay into it. (But) I think carving out those counties, that’s a tough thing to think about.”
“We need liberty and we’re not gonna quit until we get it,” adds Mark. “This will never be over until we get it.”
Enjoyed this article? Like Huck on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.
Latest on Huck
In the ’60s and ’70s, Greenwich Village was the musical heart of New York
Talkin’ Greenwich Village — Author David Browne’s new book takes readers into the neighbourhood’s creative heyday, where a generation of artists and poets including Bob Dylan, Billie Holliday and Dave Van Ronk cut their teeth.
Written by: Cyna Mirzai
How Labour Activism changed the landscape of post-war USA
American Job — A new exhibition revisits over 70 years of working class solidarity and struggle, its radical legacy, and the central role of photography throughout.
Written by: Miss Rosen
Analogue Appreciation: Emma-Jean Thackray
Weirdo — In an ever more digital, online world, we ask our favourite artists about their most cherished pieces of physical culture. Today, multi-instrumentalist and Brownswood affiliate Emma-Jean Thackray.
Written by: Emma-Jean Thackray
Meet the shop cats of Hong Kong’s Sheung Wan district
Feline good — Traditionally adopted to keep away rats from expensive produce, the feline guardians have become part of the central neighbourhood’s fabric. Erica’s online series captures the local celebrities.
Written by: Isaac Muk
How trans rights activism and sex workers’ solidarity emerged in the ’70s and ’80s
Shoulder to Shoulder — In this extract from writer Jake Hall’s new book, which deep dives into the history of queer activism and coalition, they explore how anti-TERF and anti-SWERF campaigning developed from the same cloth.
Written by: Jake Hall
A behind the scenes look at the atomic wedgie community
Stretched out — Benjamin Fredrickson’s new project and photobook ‘Wedgies’ queers a time-old bullying act by exploring its erotic, extreme potential.
Written by: Isaac Muk