Is our fear of the online world driving us further apart?
- Text by Emily Reynolds
- Illustrations by Sophie Mo
I took myself for dinner this week: a date. A strange mix of exhausted and elated, soaked to the skin from a thunderstorm, I ducked into an Italian restaurant in Soho to order a single glass of red wine and a risotto.
I was surprised by how nervous it made me. There’s a level of vulnerability in solo dining, sometimes even a danger. The idea that a man might try to speak to me was repellent, and I wanted to be left alone. But sitting with my own thoughts, no distractions, was terrifying to me. I was suddenly acutely aware of my physical form: no longer shapeless, like I was online, no longer able to melt into my phone or my laptop.
I very quickly realised that I was not alone at all. I’d been talking for days to someone I’d met online, someone who lived on the other side of the world. The conversation had veered between funny and filthy, tenderness and vulgarity, as we WhatsApped and DMed and voice-noted each other, sending endless pictures of the beautiful or banal things in front of us.
Taking a picture of my food and sending it into the void, I felt the connection flush through me and paused. Was I performing my own life for somebody else?
There’s a Margaret Atwood quote about male fantasy, on the near impossibility of escaping it. “Pretending you’re unseen, pretending you have a life of your own, that you can wash your feet and comb your hair unconscious of the ever-present watcher peering through the keyhole in your own head,” she writes. “You are a woman with a man inside watching a woman. You are your own voyeur.”
I thought of this quote as I sat there, alone but not quite, with the tangible shadow of someone else pressing against me. It’s not always a positive thing, after all: the panopticon of the male gaze, and of an online omnipresence, is often oppressive. The expectations can crush you: as my friend James succinctly put it to me, the knowledge that you can always talk to someone means you’re always considering what to say.
But at that moment, I treasured it. I treasured the feeling of being a voyeur in my own life, I treasured looking at myself with fresh eyes, with a new perspective. I treasured the person I was seeing when I did so.
And I treasured the simple, uncomplicated joy of connecting with another person four time zones away: someone I would never be beholden to, that I would never owe anything to, that I would probably never meet. Seeing my life reflected back through the filter of someone else’s made me realise how much I loved it; how happy I was.
We used to do this more. Ten years ago, when we first made MySpace accounts and happily chatted to strangers in chat rooms, there were no rules to what we could say and to who. There was a joyful unpredictability to it: talking to people from Pennsylvania one night and Seoul the next, genuinely random connections predicated on nothing more than you both having internet access.
Now, we’re more wary. Years of being ground down by bad online etiquette, by harassment, by abusive tweets; years of online dating, of being ghosted, of being left on read; years of hastily deleting posts that could probably get us fired. It’s understandably more rare that we open up, especially with someone who we might never meet.
Even on websites like Twitter, random connection is hard to come by. We follow people we work with, with the same interests as us or the same politics. The chance of something or someone genuinely surprising us is slim – something the slow decline of websites like Omegle and ChatRoulette can attest to.
In this systematic siloing of online spaces, we’ve lost something precious. We obviously need to keep ourselves safe online. But we might also benefit, sometimes, from opening ourselves up to the possibility of something more haphazard, more ridiculous, more jubilantly and pointedly meaningless. Life is full of unexpected tenderness and surprising joy, and we ought to grab it with everything we have.
Follow Emily Reynolds on Twitter.
Enjoyed this article? Like Huck on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.
Latest on Huck
5 decades ago, Larry Sultan & Mike Mandel redefined photography
Evidence — Between 1975 and 1977, the two photographers sifted through thousands of images held by official institutions, condensing them into a game-changing sequence.
Written by: Miss Rosen
Warm portraits of English football fans before the Premier League
Going to the Match — In the 1991/1992 season, photographer Richard Davis set out to understand how the sport’s supporters were changing, inadvertently capturing the end of an era.
Written by: Isaac Muk
Tbilisi nightclubs to reopen for New Year’s Eve after 40-day strike
Dancefloor resistance — Georgian techno havens including BASSIANI and Left Bank have announced parties tonight, having shuttered in solidarity with protests against the country’s government.
Written by: Isaac Muk
Why did 2024 feel so unreal?
Unrest & Stagnation — With unending mind-boggling news stories, the past 12 months have felt like a spiral into insanity. Is AI to blame or a hangover from the pandemic? Newsletter columnist Emma Garland digests the mess.
Written by: Emma Garland
The party starters fighting to revive Stonehenge’s Solstice Free Festival
Free the Stones! delves into the vibrant community that reignites Stonehenge’s Solstice Free Festival, a celebration suppressed for nearly four decades.
Written by: Laura Witucka
Hypnotic Scenes of 90s London Nightlife
Legendary photographer Eddie Otchere looks back at this epic chapter of the capital’s story in new photobook ‘Metalheadz, Blue Note London 1994–1996’
Written by: Miss Rosen